MPWR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom has a net margin of 23.29% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 36.89%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 75.35% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 14.67%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $783.10, signalling upside risk potential of 49.2%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $241.12 which suggests that it could grow by 38.09%. Given that Monolithic Power Systems has higher upside potential than Broadcom, analysts believe Monolithic Power Systems is more attractive than Broadcom.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.206, which suggesting that the stock is 20.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.474%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Broadcom offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Broadcom's is not.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $621.7M, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.9B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $1.4B is lower than Broadcom's net income of $5.5B. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.27x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 83.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 11.61x versus 15.31x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 23.29% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 11.02%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 75.35% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $783.10, signalling upside risk potential of 49.2%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $107.01 which suggests that it could grow by 106.07%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Monolithic Power Systems, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Monolithic Power Systems.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.206, which suggesting that the stock is 20.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.781, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.133%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $621.7M, which are smaller than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $1.4B is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.27x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 11.61x versus 7.79x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 23.29% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 56.17%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 75.35% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $783.10, signalling upside risk potential of 49.2%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $167.33 which suggests that it could grow by 60.14%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Monolithic Power Systems, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Monolithic Power Systems.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.206, which suggesting that the stock is 20.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.871%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $621.7M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $1.4B is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.27x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 35.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 11.61x versus 19.86x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Instruments has a net margin of 23.29% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 30.07%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 75.35% beat Texas Instruments's return on equity of 28.14%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $783.10, signalling upside risk potential of 49.2%. On the other hand Texas Instruments has an analysts' consensus of $198.53 which suggests that it could grow by 36.41%. Given that Monolithic Power Systems has higher upside potential than Texas Instruments, analysts believe Monolithic Power Systems is more attractive than Texas Instruments.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.206, which suggesting that the stock is 20.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Instruments has a beta of 0.986, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.397%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Texas Instruments offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Instruments pays out 99.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $621.7M, which are smaller than Texas Instruments quarterly revenues of $4B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $1.4B is higher than Texas Instruments's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.27x while Texas Instruments's PE ratio is 28.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 11.61x versus 8.61x for Texas Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.